And sometimes they could come in handy. My first surprise was as any Leica M240 user would likely tell you just how familiar it felt. A microphone port allows connecting external high-end or specialized microphones. The M240 is a great camera that produces gorgeous images but you are undoubtedly going to love the M10. Live-view brings something extra to a type of camera I had previously (possibly quite stubbornly) felt couldnt be improved. Its marquee features are omissions rather than additions: the M-D doesn't . We were perfectly happy in the film days when KODAK or FUJI(film) updated our sensor with a new emulsion. It has two memory card slots, allowing you to store more photos without switching cards. Of course, Id skipped the M240 and gone from M9 to M262 though surprisingly, the menu system of the M262 is even more stripped back than that of the M9. I shoot with 35mm and 50mm lenses. The more focus points the more flexibility in picking which part of the scene to focus on. You can click any image for a larger view which is the best way to view it as this site compresses these down to what you see below . Quick charge with automatic constant current control prevents battery from overcharging, short circuit, and electronic shock Afternoon all and best wishes for a happy 2021! The firmware adds 6-bit code support and correction profiles for new lenses . Actually, a large part of this is because they dont often inspire me to write about them whilst I own them, yet I hate to see them go without doing them the justice of sharing a few thoughts.var cid='8222364248';var pid='ca-pub-7054871687658000';var slotId='div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0';var ffid=1;var alS=1002%1000;var container=document.getElementById(slotId);container.style.width='100%';var ins=document.createElement('ins');ins.id=slotId+'-asloaded';ins.className='adsbygoogle ezasloaded';ins.dataset.adClient=pid;ins.dataset.adChannel=cid;if(ffid==2){ins.dataset.fullWidthResponsive='true';} If not, get the 262. 1) Slimmer - The M10 has a slimmer camera body than the M240, similar to the Leica film cameras such as a Leica M6. LV is handy for confirming RF calibration. An indicator shows you when the device has low battery. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. Thanks a lot for your replies. This happens with the M240 from time to time. The M262 was not available when I bought my my M240 but if I was buying now I would still go for the M240. The view taken by some Leica users when the M240 was released was that features like live-view and video had no place on a Leica. It was designed and released after the M240 to offer an option to photographers who didnt need the bells and whistles the M240 had to offer. Find out more about 35mmc here. The Leica M10-R rangefinder camera has a newly developed 40 megapixel sensor that represents a big increase from the 24 megapixels of the previous M10 model. They were taken about a minute apart as I only had one tripod and needed to put the . Help us by suggesting a value. The image on viewfinder of that camera is very warm yet when the images are loaded onto the computer they are less so. Thank you for it. by Charles Higham, https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Wong+Laica+M+262, https://www.35mmc.com/14/10/2017/fuji-x100f-fuji-lost-sight-elegant-original-concept/, A Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 ZM Distagon Review - An Optical Wonder! This has become a bit of a trend now, I buy a digital Leica, shoot with it for a while, decide to sell it for one reason or another, and then scramble to write about it in the final few days of owning it. Some cards are woefully slow. Image: Leica. Thankfully with the M10 theyve returned to the old system. Best wishes to you all and thanks again for your help. The color profile is quite different too, with more electric blues and purer reds. The LEICA M typ 240 is the world's second full-frame mirrorless camera. I really enjoyed the m60 when I shot it a few years back, but for practical day-to-day photography, I think a screen suits my digital shooting desires better.And besides, the little flip out thumb-rest?! I dont need such features on my Leica rangefinders these are real cameras that I use properly, I dont need live-view with my real cameras! It does take lovely photos however and I dont mind using I most of the time but. Without a magnifier piece.comfortable view is 50-35mm. They arent rangefinder coupled past 1m, but nonetheless they do focus that close. With less than full coverage, you may have to crop your photos afterward to get them looking perfect. And thats pushing it. It unites decades of experience in rangefinder technology with groundbreaking digital technologies: It features a completely newly developed high-resolution full-format CMOS sensor that, in combination with its high-performance processor and the legendary M-Lenses; delivers outstanding . The M240 is a bit slow on the uptake, but I generally leave the camera on while on photo walks so not a real issue.Lock-ups. Even when recording scenes with a lot of fast movements, the videos are sharp and clear. Selling the M262, a camera that I purchased for its pure simplicity; and keeping the Z6, a camera that I purchased for its many features (including live view, a hybrid camera with fantastic video capabilities including full frame 4K, compatibility with my Profoto strobes, owning quite a bit of Nikon F-mount glass, auto-focus, etc.)! It was mentioned in LFI first issue of 2016. For example, I am in a coffee shop with the camera sitting on a Manfrotto table top tripod. I remember having an unexpected opportunity to fondle the M10, when it was first promoted, when a Leica rep. happened to visit my favorite camera shop. That said, Ive sometimes found that shooting in high contrast situations the exposure prefers to underexpose slightly, yet have always found the shadows to have plenty enough detail in them when pulled out in post. The renderings are quite good as a whole, and this feature is not contained in the M10 which relegates one to only the lens filter option.Card Writing Speed. It tells you : take your time, have fun with the manual focus, enjoy the concepts small is beautiful and less is more, listen to the music made by the shutter, look how discret you are when shooting and readily agreed, leave the arm race to the geek and feel free to take pictures your way.Shooting with the M262 is as simple and as pleasant as a walk in the forest in summer. It usesa 24-megapixel CMOS sensor, a Maestro image processor witha near-silent shutter, and a quiet shutter-cocking motor. I dont need to get excited by them dont get me wrong, theres fun in a camera that provides some sort of novelty initially, but longer-term I just need my cameras to work in a way that suits me. On the M240 its easy to change ISO by simply pressing the dedicated ISO button and turning the thumb adjustment wheel.The EVF. Leica m240 sony a7sii . That said, even in the short time Ive owned a Leica M240, its confused me with what seems like an obvious short coming, changed my mind about one feature that I had written of as pretty much useless to me, proved that another one of its highlight features is indeed something I have no interest in, and perhaps unfortunately (since I cant afford one) left me with big a chunk of Leica M10 GAS. The smaller file size also allows quicker read/write speeds. Yes, it adds a Wi-Fi connectivity, which is something completely new in my workflow, but the overall experience is so much simpler. I guess its only really there as it was the most logical thing for Leica to put there in place of the LV live view button on the M240. If you like aluminium choose the M262, if you prefer brass go for the M240. The use of a CMOS sensor allowed Leica to include two key features that the previous M9 didnt have. It's slightly lighter than the 240 and I have no use for video nor live view in a Leica. To set it, you simply half press the shutter then jog the thumb dial. That said, I dont shoot Leicas for rapidity.Start Up. The Digital Leica M Samples Gallery (Any digital M from M8 to M-D 262) Below are all images taken with a digital Leica M from the 240 to the m_P to the M-D, the latest and greatest M Rangefinders from Leica Camera. On the Leica M262 the thumb dial can be set to control exposure compensation. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder. I just dont shoot it at that high ISO for it to be a problem, and often wonder what on earth people are doing with their cameras to need the sorts of high ISOs that get spoken about it reviews. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. A M262 is a friendly camera. The M10 has the new ISO wheel on the top left. As the cameras are meant to have identical sensors, do we think this is just new owner's biased impressions (nothing wrong with that btw) is could there be something in this? Nice write-up. great output, but cant get a shot off faster than with the M8. However it is nice to have a brand new camera and if you can manage without Liveview most M262 users seem very happy with it. This thing has live-view, and video. You mirror my sentiments about the camera to a t! With a standard mini jack socket, you can use the device with most headphones. Funnily enough, when searching to find out if I was the only one to notice this, I found this post on a forum where someone finds the same issue, but prefers the cooler screen of his Leica M240 to the later M-P version of the M240 which seems to have the same warmer screen as my M262. The M10 is akin in size to an M6TTL and this is a benefit. Well worth seeking out. For a start, the battery in the M262 was a lot bigger than that in the M9. M9 is magic, even SOOC jpgs. The camera becomes entirely unresponsive. I do think the 262 files have an edge over the 240. My biggest issue in day-to-day use was the control over the ISO, which I find leaves me a little disconnected from what setting Im using. In one of his editorial pieces in Amateur Photographer he applauds this philosophy. The top plate of the M262 feels slightly more hollow than the M240 not it a way that you can feel it, but you can sort of hear it if you tap it, and even sometimes when the strap rattles on it. Or pictures are completely similar? They also give the image sensor a better probability in identifying the right area of the scene to focus on in more automatic modes. If you intend to use lenses wider than 28mm or longer than 135mm Liveview and EVF are very useful, also macro photography is much easier (essential with the new 90mm macro lens and macro adapter) or if you need video. For my abilities and needs, I have a decent collection of film cameras (too many some might say) and an M8 which is surprisingly still better than just good and more than good enough for what I tend to photograph.But I admit to seriously considering the new Q2, That Q2 has excited a lot of people, it seems!Re. I find the M262 colours different enough from the M-P I just sold - to my eye the blues, reds, aquas and purples feel denser. By comparison, the Leica M240 had a lot of features many of which, as Ive alluded to, were seen by some as not needed on a Leica M rangefinder. Now, Im writing this after my M262 has come back from Germany (it only took a couple of months!! Last year I got the 262 and had been quite pleased with it. Having live-view is great and the screen is an improvement but its too big for an M and the files look/feel like something that came out of a Sony. That alone justifies the decision to buy. One of the most important aspects of a camera is the size of its sensor. Ive tried all of the digital M types and my heartfelt favorites are the M8 and M9-P (equally), then the Typ 262 in that order. I did find a custom LR preset that helps a lot, but it would be nice to have natural skin tones straight from the camera. Plus it's lighter. Leica has used the button space on the rear of the camera that is used for live view in the Typ 240 to . What is the highest ISO you are comfortable with the 240/262?I find the focus peaking on my M10 better than the Sonys Ive used. It is a quick overview and specs comparisonLeica M-E Typ 240 vs Leica M typ 262====="Subscribe and Share" for more Videosht. Any help you learned people would be able to give me as to M240 vs M262 and a good lenswould be invaluable and very much appreciated. I could get myself in position where something was about to happen, use the rangefinder or live-view to pick a point of focus, then whilst looking at the back of the camera I could use my peripheral vision to judge the timing of whatever I was taking a photo of whilst maintaining focus confirmation.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2','ezslot_17',184,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2-0'); I do this all the time with the Sony cameras, yet had never joined the dots and worked out that it might be something Id enjoy or find use for with a rangefinder. Because I only shoot raw, I dont need the white balance settings. Everything is very tactile. I wanted an M262 for all the reasons above but found an M-P 240 for a really good price and just turned off all the video and live view. Other new features include an expanded ISO range of 100 to 50000, 16 minute maximum exposure time, dynamic range equivalent of 13.5 stops, an on-screen level gauge, and super quiet . Good thing, I don't need to upgrade further, as those are plenty enough for many years to come. It is capable of shooting stills in a lossless compressed raw format. It has a better screen, live-view, no video and even has a ISO dial (like you might find on a Fuji). After the M11 released though, used prices of the M10 dropped and I decided to get one. Im still getting used to it, but for me a 2 issues, weight with a big 50mm lens and editing the files you really bring out the image quality as it seems a bit flat to me. I have a X113 and an M262. Using an M this way does not give me the same fundamental photography pleasure as the M8 or M-9P do, but, what it does give me is the ability to scratch the inevitable itch that eventually comes to every M8/9/ME user the desire to use their M for other tasks theirs just cannot do (macro work, adapting other lenses for example). One is not better or worse than the other, they are just different. Now, if the shutter was fully mechanical and cocked by hand that would be a very different thing. It was designed and released after the M240 to offer an option to photographers who didn't need the bells and whistles the M240 had to offer. Really useful! I've always wanted a Leica and was thinking of picking up a used M262 or M240 to replace my Fuji. A week or so later I was on a shoot for work. The maximum resolution available for videos shot with the main camera. An electronic viewfinder (EVF) with a higher resolution provides a sharper image, producing a view comparable in quality with the one displayed on an optical viewfinder. Hey all, I've owned an M6 for several years and in the next few months will be unloading a few of my higher-end film cameras to (downsize and) purchase a digital Leica to compliment my M6. "MM-P""" Leica M Typ240MM-P Typ240 Whats the best camera for around $2000? I have gotten perfectly good images with the M-240 at ISO 2000 and at 3200 the images are still manageable with a small amount of noise reduction in LR. This really piqued my interest. Family moments are precious and sometimes you want to capture that time spent with loved ones or friends in better quality than your phone can manage. This is particularly useful on long shoots when you need more space. I sometimes shot movies and it was amazing. Yeah, I edit all my digital images, so I guess I dont really think about that. Same lens, same settings - desaturated during RAW conversion. But even then, its not close to other modern cameras. Loomis77December 27, 2020 in Leica M (Type 240 / 262). Limited to 75 - 35/28mm. People get all gnarled up about refresh rates and such, but the M240s EVF is fine for its limited uses.Focus Peaking. Here are photos from my first shoot with it: https://matthewtrader.com/leica-m262-review-after-photographing-my-nieces-5th-birthday-party. It serves specific duty now, monochrome and infrared imaging only. Whilst I fully get that it is down to personal preference, I just thought I would ask the question: M240 (or its E and P variants) or M262? Most of the digital M bodies are going to offer a satisfactory experience for the average first time Leica user. But, when my M262 needed to go to German camera hospital for what I guessed might be a significant amount of time (as is often the case), I figured I had little to loose trying out an M240 for a few weeks/months. A raw image file contains minimally processed data from the image sensor. Why poor white balance, plus bad color in JPEG files, for Q2 camera? I too prefer the more stripped back feature set of the M9, M240, and M10. Although I know right from the gate that my M-P Typ 240 wont get as much use as my new heart winning M9-P, it will however keep me from having that inevitable internal debate of owning just one old or new M body. Don't be one of those people who blows their budget on a body and can barely afford to buy a lens or two. Have a read of this for tips. I have an M246 where just holding down the ISO button, turning the thumbwheel to change it then releasing does the job. What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? The Leica M [typ 240] (or M240 for short) was the first Leica to adopt the odd naming convention that broke away from the M# convention of yore. That breaks the rules by my measure, unfortunately . Your link has been automatically embedded. My M8 is still around for those who are wondering. The even newer M-P Typ 240 purchase just opens up addtional opportunities of using a digital M as a multi-purpose tool. When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp. Paste as plain text instead, Edward - you are right about the blues and reds. It depends on your needs. High ISO performance a must wish it was even better. But, as someone who shoots, buys and sells a lot of different lenses, the bigger screen would definitely offer me an advantage Id be able to take photos and check lenses were calibrated properly etc. Image quality will be essentially the same. In practice, this has translated into me being able to shoot it for a lot longer without having to think about changing or charging the battery. If you intend to use lenses wider than 28mm or longer than 135mm Liveview and EVF are very useful, also macro photography is much easier (essential with the new 90mm macro lens and macro adapter) or if you need video. as first digital Leica M, I'd take M (typ 262) but if the M (typ240) is cheaper, go ahead. I think either will be a fine way into a Leica. Changing from color to black and white takes a lot of menu meandering and I wish there was a way to place this setting into a favorites menu as in the M10 (I think). Functionalism be damned. I typically use a 75mm lens on my M 262. Its still inaccurate, but at least the photos look pleasant enough. Yes!! So I am very glad I got the 240 version. I remember initially thinking that the colours coming out of the M10 files seemed thin when compared to those of the M240 and the photos in your review of the M262 have reminded me of that. Since receiving a closer focusing lens though Ive noticed that actually the M10 rangefinder goes down to about 0.58m and the M262 goes to about 0.65m. Using the right SD card is key here. Value for money, incredible quality. So its not a financial burden to have it around, and selling it wont yield me that much cash, and I have no desire to sell it anyways since its my favorite M of all time that still serves some legitimate purpose. Epson RD1 style I loved my RD1! Ive had it for years and purchased it when M8s were at their lowest prices. Great Image quality (warmer than M-10, looks more like M-9 CCD image rendering). With regards to minimizing my digital camera gear, my thinking was simple. Let's try another side by side Leica Monochrom - 50 Lux - click for larger and crop - Leica M 240 - click for larger. Im not sure about the iso dial though, I feel like thats a feature that would really suit me. The price is$5195/4050. Congratulations on your decision. In short, getting two cameras- a classic and a modern type, solves the damnable inadequacy issue that arises in all of us when you own just one type. I shouldve read the manual! Id mounted the lens to my M262 and was pondering how I was going to get used to shooting a 35mm lens again in such a short period []. The model omits the Typ 240's live view and video capabilities, and has a much simpler menu structure and one-button access to . BECOME A MEMBER to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMbqwh98qO5wWowtQjIK8ig/joinEXCLUSIVE PRESETS FOR IMAGES CAPTURED WITH LEICA CAMERAS:. It might be a step backwards in volume of features, but it was a step in the right direction in terms what I think a Leica camera should stand for. By In fact, I likely wouldnt be selling it at all if it werent for the fact that I recently and quite inadvertently gave myself a big chunk of M10 gear acquisition syndrome! I wish I did. Leica M262 M-P M10 M262 Leica M-E . The Leica M-D Typ 262 was released in 2016 and is already rather difficult to find. Thankfully with the M10 they've returned to the old system. Really thats been the beauty of the Leica M262 for me for the most part, its done almost exactly what Ive needed it to. Thirty days, a new sensor, a new shutter mechanism, and a couple other tweaks and the camera was better than new. Shooting with the Leica M262 in manual ISO takes 3 commands to change and set the ISO. This might sound like a small criticism, and Im sure many wouldnt even notice or care, but actually it goes back to what I was saying earlier about familiarity. Its back to the basics. But the M9 for me has so many characteristics, beyond specs, iso performance or touchscreen blah blah blah. I am very pleased to be in a forum withso many helpful people. Which is the better buy? A series of photographs taken from the same position over a long period is joined together to create a short video. Same settings, same ISO of 320, etc. This means the image will be stabilised regardless of what lens is being used. Keep forgetting about that. I didn't do any critical tests, but I feel the M262 may have around one stop advantage at high iso. No. Unfortunately, my business partner has also vetoed the idea of me selling both M240 and M262 to buy an M10. RE: the ISO issue. It seemed it was not much larger than an M7; that, alone, was enough to make me decide I would own one someday. Edit: Since writing this I have been made aware that pressing and holding the ISO button is the quickest way to change ISO. As is the image quality of the M10. It only having felt right once in 6 months felt wrong. The Leica M (Typ 262) is a digital rangefinder camera announced by Leica Camera on November 19, 2015. Of course with these features comes a fairly significant increase in menu options too, though I must admit, I was surprised how simple the menu remains given the extra features on offer. They've been even used in a documentary made by a friend of mine. You can post now and register later. It leaves me with no desire whatsoever to upgrade at all and will be my sole digital camera for hopefully many years to come. Flip-out screens can be useful for tricky shots. Great pictures and very interesting. Ultra-niche appeal. Nice review.I bought a m262 this year when one of my pensions surprisingly came out.I wanted1] a digital leica m2] no video3] no live view4] no EVFBut i like to sometimes review a pic when i am out and about.The 262 is perfect for me and i love it.with the m-e 240 being announced i have noticed that used 262 cameras have already dropped in price so its possible i can buy a dream 2nd body.Meaning another 262. Thanks for posting, enjoyed the images. Im not trying to justify myself I certainly wouldnt to trolls the point is simply that I spend my money on something I enjoy. It then required a short trip to camera-hospital in Germany. All images generated with the M262 + 24mm 3.8 were taken July 6 between 3 and 5 PM around Victoria, BC in direct overhead sunlight (far from ideal), https://www.dropbox.com/sh/borvrgwfsovpoiz/AADvQ-IsxTfl51btqaCD_i4Fa?dl=0. I have looked into all three cameras and all seem like perfectly great cameras . I know this is an old article but so what, I m commenting anyways. From what I gather, skin tones have better rendering with the M10. Display as a link instead, As such, the Leica M262 is possibly better seen as a sidestep rather than a step forward in the Leica lineup. Another M10 fetish is better performance at high ISO.